Elliptical Trainers and Cross Trainers Compared

“Elliptical” and “cross trainer” are used interchangeably in the UK, and the difference in practice is what the machine includes rather than what it is called. What matters far more is a handful of geometry specifications that determine whether the machine suits your body, and those are rarely at the top of a listing.

The geometry that decides the feel

Specification	What it changes	Why it matters
Stride length	How far the pedals travel front to back	Too short feels cramped and choppy; too long over-extends the hips. The single most important specification in the category.
Flywheel position	Front, rear or centre drive	Changes the shape of the motion path and the machine’s footprint.
Q-factor (pedal spacing)	How far apart your feet are	A wide stance can cause hip and knee discomfort over longer sessions.
Pedal articulation	Whether the footplate pivots	Affects ankle comfort and numbness on longer sessions.
Incline capability	Changes the motion path angle	Shifts emphasis between quadriceps and posterior chain.

Of these, stride length is the one to establish first. It should broadly suit your height, and machines with adjustable stride are genuinely useful in a household where heights differ substantially. If you can, try before buying — a stride that does not suit you is not something you adapt to.

Front, rear and centre drive

• Rear drive tends to produce a flatter, more natural motion path and a longer machine.
• Front drive gives a steeper path with more of an incline feel, and is frequently more compact.
• Centre drive places the flywheel beside or beneath the user, producing the shortest footprint and a more upright posture. Usually the most expensive.

None is inherently better. Centre drive is worth knowing about if space is tight, because it is the one meaningful answer to a cross trainer’s footprint problem.

The specifications that do less than they appear to

• Number of resistance levels. Twenty-four levels is not better than sixteen if you use four of them.
• Programme count. Rarely used and easily replaced by an app.
• Displayed distance. A conversion from stride count using an assumed stride length. Internally consistent, but not comparable to distance anywhere else.
• Calorie readout. An estimate from a generic model, useful only as a relative measure between your own sessions.

Footprint and ceiling height

Two things catch people out. Cross trainers are long, particularly rear-drive models, and unlike a rower they do not fold away meaningfully. Whatever floor area the machine takes, it takes permanently.

More importantly, the pedals raise you off the floor, often by a substantial amount, and the stride raises you further at the top. Measure your ceiling against your height plus the pedal height plus a margin. This is the most common reason a cross trainer cannot go in a room with a standard ceiling, and it is almost never mentioned in listings.

Where cross trainers genuinely win

• No impact with meaningful muscle involvement, which is the combination that suits sensitive knees, hips and ankles.
• Upper body included via the moving handles, unlike a bike.
• Upright position, which makes reading or watching something straightforward — and for many people that is what makes longer sessions happen at all.
• No learning curve. The machine guides the path and there is very little to do wrong.
• Quiet. Magnetic resistance and no footfall means very little noise transmitted into a building.

Where they lose

• Space. Large and permanent, with a real ceiling requirement.
• The machine carries some of the work. The guided path and the flywheel do more than they would on a rower, which is part of why it feels easier.
• Not weight-bearing in the way walking is. Your feet never leave the pedals.
• Moving it is difficult. Heavy, awkward, and usually assembled in place.

Buying one used

Cross trainers are common second-hand because they are large and people move house. The wear points are specific and checkable: work the machine through a full stride at moderate resistance and listen for knocking, which usually indicates the pedal arm bearings or the joints where the arms meet the frame. That knock is the fault most likely to be terminal and most likely to be described by a seller as “a slight noise”.

Also check the console works, that the resistance changes audibly and perceptibly across its range, and that the machine can be dismantled enough to get it out of the room it is in — which is your problem, not the seller’s, once you have paid.

Stride length against user height

Since stride length is the specification that most determines whether a cross trainer suits you, it is worth being concrete about how to assess it.

• Too short feels choppy and cramped, keeps the knees more bent throughout, and is the more common problem for taller users on budget machines.
• Too long over-extends the hips at the extremes and produces a reaching, unstable feel. More common for shorter users on machines built around an average.
• Adjustable stride is genuinely useful in a household with a wide height range, and is one of the few adjustable specifications in this category worth paying for.

If you cannot try a machine, the best proxies are the published stride length and the manufacturer’s stated user height range. Where a listing gives neither, treat that as informative in itself.

Handles, and whether you use them

Cross trainers usually have both moving handles and fixed central grips. The moving handles are what make the machine full-body; the fixed grips let you isolate the legs or simply hold on.

Two practical points. Using the moving handles properly means pushing and pulling rather than hanging on and letting the legs drive them, which is what most people do by default. And gripping the fixed handles hard enough to lean on them transfers work away from the legs, which is the equivalent of holding a treadmill’s handrails on an incline. Neither is a fault in the machine, but both change how much work a session actually represents.

Where a cross trainer sits against a rower

These two get compared constantly, and the honest split is straightforward. The rower involves more muscle and gives more training per minute, and requires a technique and a two-metre run. The cross trainer requires neither, keeps you upright so you can read or watch something, and takes large permanent floor space that does not come back. Choose on which of those constraints binds harder in your situation.

Related reading

• Start here: Choosing a Rowing Machine: Resistance Type and Build
• Rowing Machine Against Cross Trainer
• Choosing a Treadmill: Matching Specification to How You Will Use It
• Browse rowing machines
• Not sure where to start? Try the equipment recommendation tool

---